City Hall

Boston City Council and the State House: Who Does What

Boston is unusually dependent on the state legislature for its own local decisions. Here is why, and what it means for getting anything done.

Filed byEleanor Whitcomb
Published
Read time2 minutes
Boston City Council and the State House: Who Does What

Two buildings govern Boston, and the relationship between them is the thing most residents misunderstand. City Hall runs the city. The State House on Beacon Hill runs the Commonwealth, and it also has more say over Boston's internal affairs than most people expect.

City Hall

Boston has a mayor and a city council. The mayor holds substantial executive power, running departments and proposing the budget. The council legislates, approves the budget, and holds hearings.

The council includes both district councillors, elected from geographic parts of the city, and at-large councillors elected citywide. That mix means every resident has more than one councillor who represents them, which is a genuinely useful thing to know when you need help with something.

The State House

Massachusetts is governed from Beacon Hill by the governor and the legislature, formally the General Court, made up of the House and Senate.

Here is the part that surprises people: Massachusetts municipalities have limited home rule, and Boston frequently needs the legislature's permission to do things that seem entirely local. A city measure can pass the council, be signed by the mayor, and still require a home rule petition approved on Beacon Hill before it takes effect.

This is why a Boston policy debate so often ends with the sentence "and now it goes to the State House," and why it can then sit there. The legislature has its own priorities, its own calendar, and no obligation to act on a city's request.

Boston is smaller than you think

The City of Boston proper is a modest slice of what people mean when they say Boston. Cambridge, Somerville, Brookline, Quincy, Newton and Chelsea are separate cities and towns with their own mayors or managers, their own councils, their own police and their own schools.

That has real consequences. A housing rule adopted in Boston does not apply in Cambridge. A Somerville decision is not a Boston decision. And a regional problem, transit, housing supply, water, has to be negotiated across dozens of independent municipalities rather than decided by one government.

The MBTA, which crosses all of those boundaries, is a state authority rather than a city one. That structural fact explains a great deal about why transit accountability in this region is complicated.

Who to contact

For city services, potholes, trash, permits, inspections, start with the city and your councillors. Having both a district and at-large councillors means several offices can take up a constituent problem.

For anything involving state law, the MBTA, or a matter requiring home rule approval, your state representative and state senator are the relevant officials, and they are different people from your city councillors.

For a problem in Cambridge or Somerville, contact Cambridge or Somerville. This sounds obvious and is the single most common misdirected complaint in the region.

Why it works this way

Massachusetts government is old, and the arrangement reflects centuries of accumulated practice rather than a designed system. The limits on municipal authority long predate anyone currently serving.

Whether that is a reasonable check on cities or an obstacle to letting them govern themselves is a live argument here, and you will hear both positions made seriously by people who know the system well.

About the author

Eleanor Whitcomb

Eleanor Whitcomb is the editor of Daily Bostonian. She has covered Boston City Hall and the State House, and edits the paper's daily report.